Personal information search engine name purge

Very rarely will your content be removed from the active search results quickly, and then only in cases where the content remaining could cause legal issues. What can you do?

10 steps to erase your digital footprint

When it comes to hiding and removing content on the web , there are a number of things you can do. If you want the page entirely hidden from Google, however, what you need to do is present the search engine with a page. That means the content needs to be entirely removed, not redirected. Next, scan your site for any pages that link to the removed page. This includes your site map, with one exception mentioned later. You should be able to generate a list of incoming links to the page and remove them throughout your site. This one is much harder. Normally, those backlinks are valuable.

Contact webmasters and blog owners, explain that the content is being removed and that they will want to remove the broken link as soon as possible. It may be tempting to block the page with your robots. In fact, this is the opposite of what you want to do. If the page is blocked, remove that block. If it remains gone, they will eventually remove it from the search results. You can use this to submit a page for removal from live search and from cached results. Again, this may or may not be an effective way to remove the page, depending on the reason for removal.

Once you have taken these steps, all you can do is wait.

Google will eventually learn that the page no longer exists and will stop offering it in the live search results. All of the above is for the main live search through Google itself.

Personal Sites

Slideshare, now hosted by LinkedIn, is a great tool for searching documented slideshow presentations, as well as PDFs and eBooks. You can save slides you might need to refer to later and download entire slideshows direct from the platform. More people searching for information on the web using voice-commands is a paradigm shift being observed. Four crucial ways voice search impacts your brand.

Insights on the understanding of attribution models and more SEO aspects shared. Search Engine Watch. Amazon Advertising. Toggle navigation Home. Industry 21 May 18 Luke Richards. Share this article. Related articles How to educate clients about SEO and earn their trust. The evolution of Google's rel "no follow".

Related reading. Different ways voice search is affecting your brand More people searching for information on the web using voice-commands is a paradigm shift being observed. Search engines must comply with European privacy provisions if they maintain an establishment in one of the EU Member States, or if they use automated equipment based in one of the Member States for the purposes of processing personal data. European privacy rules limit the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information. The privacy officials who make up the EU Article 29 Working Group have stated that "the protection of the users' privacy and the guaranteeing of their rights, such as the right to access to their data and the right to information as provided for by the applicable data protection regulations, remain the core issues of the ongoing debate.

Google , the leading Internet search engine, automatically collects its users' search terms in connection with their IP addresses.


  1. thirty days delay entry judgment divorce california.
  2. Discover yourself.
  3. locate tax id number for daycare.

Google states that, after collection, it retains the personally identifiable information for 18 months, and then "anonymizes" the data linking search terms to specific IP addresses by erasing the last octect of the IP address. On December 17, , Yahoo announced that it would erase the last octect of the IP address after 90 days. The search engine company previously retained the data for for 13 months. Microsoft makes search query data anonymous after 18 months by permanently removing cookie IDs, the entire IP address and other identifiers from search terms.

Ixquick states that it deletes users' search data including IP addresses within 48 hours. Ixquick further states that it does not set any uniquely identifying cookies, and that it shares data with 3rd parties only in limited circumstances. Share this page:. Defend Privacy.

How search engines see the web

Donate Now. Search Engine Privacy Background Resources News Introduction Internet search engines are the primary means by which individuals access Internet content. The new rules would follow the EU's General Data Protection Regulation by strengthening rules for obtaining consent, making it easier for consumers to withdraw consent, and improving consumers' ability to access, move, and remove data about themselves.

The bill would also expand the definition of "personal data" to include DNA and IP addresses and would make it a crime to re-identify individuals from anonymized data. EPIC supported the GDPR and the right to be forgotten , has explained that IP addresses are personal data, and has warned of the risks of improperly "de-identified" data.

EPIC recently filed a complaint asking the FTC to investigate Google's use of a proprietary, secret algorithm Google claims can "de-identify" consumers while tracking their purchases. He found that dynamic IP addresses are personal data subject to data protection law. The opinion concerns the case of German pirate party politician and privacy activist Patrick Breyer who is suing the German government over logging visits to government websites.

External Sites

The opinion is not legally binding but "is usually a good indication of how the court will eventually rule". EPIC has supported Internet anonymity since the s and brought a similar challenge to the US government tracking of users of government website. A reasonable jury could conclude that Google's "deceitful override of the plaintiffs' cookie blockers" constitutes a "serious invasion of privacy" under California law.

The appeals court also held that tracked URLs could constitute "content" under the federal Wiretap Act, though it ultimately upheld the dismissal of all federal law claims for other reasons. According to a new survey , nine out of ten voters in the United States want the right to delete links to personal information.

Those voters say they would support a U. Last May the top court in the European Union established the "right to be forgotten" as a fundamental right, protected by the EU Constitution. EU citizens may require search companies to remove personal information that is inadequate, irrelevant, and inaccurate.

Twitter Thread On How To Delete Yourself From The Internet Goes Viral

The Federal Trade Commission has reached a settlement with Google over allegations that the company unfairly charged parents millions of dollars for their children's in-app purchases. The settlement mandates that Google provides full refunds for unauthorized purchases. The FTC agreement will be subject to public comments. Comments are due October 6, The Commission has previously settled charges with Apple and sued Amazon for charging parents for their kids unauthorized in-app purchases. A federal judge reviewing a proposed class action settlement in a case concerning Google's disclosure of user data to third parties has said "it doesn't pass the smell test.

The consumer privacy organization wrote to the judge when the settlement was first proposed and again last week , before the final fairness hearing. The groups cited the skepticism expressed by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts about a similar privacy settlement.

How to remove yourself from Whitepages, Spokeo, and other listings - Business Insider Deutschland

EPIC, joined by leading consumer protection organizations, has asked a federal judge to reject a proposed class action settlement in In re Google Referrer Header Litigation. The settlement requires no substantial change in Google's business practices and provides no benefit to class members. EPIC wrote to the same judge last year when the settlement was first proposed, urging him not to approve.

And the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court has expressed deep skepticism about settlements that provide no benefits to class members. The judge in the Google care will rule on the settlement August The agency stated that it "systematically monitors compliance" with its consumer protection orders and that it "takes alleged violation[s] of an order seriously," but that it cannot publicly disclose details of its investigations until a formal complaint is issued. In , Google was sued for sharing user web browsing information with advertisers.

Under the proposed settlement agreement , Google will distribute several million dollars to a handful of organizations, many of which already have ties to the company. EPIC and other privacy organizations urged the Commission to formally object because the proposed agreement "confers no monetary relief to class members, compels no change in Google's behavior, and misallocates the cy pres distribution. Facebook , an unfair class action settlement in the Ninth Circuit. EPIC, along with a group of consumer privacy organizations, has asked the Federal Trade Commission to object to an unfair class action settlement in California federal court.

EPIC and other privacy organizations have argued that the proposed agreement "confers no monetary relief to class members, compels no change in Google's behavior, and misallocates the cy pres distribution" to organizations that are "not aligned with the interests of class members and do not further the purpose of the litigation.